At least in Sweden there is a certain tendency to union map projects to one huge map database (f.ex. SoIK Hellas Orientering). The thereby uprising task is to handle the fact, that the so merged supermap is to big to maintain at once. Partly-Revisions must be integrated into the super-map and also the differing history of different parts (including different authors) of the map must be documented.
It might be helpful to introduce a standardized documentation layer to each map project as sketched in fig.1.
fig.1. Possible map history layer for the Hemfosa-Map. Different parts of the map have seen 0-3 so called "shallow revisions".
Do you have a good example of an "in file documentation"? - I would be interested to see it.
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
o-zeugs over and out (late wc china finding)
Yes. Let the o-zeugs blog rest in peace. I´ll take it down eventually. And yes, I stumbled over the decisions of the Ethics Panel regarding ...
-
I here describe the way of the couch-mapper or with other words how far you can get with a swedish .las file (and karttapullautin , OL Lase...
-
Yes. Let the o-zeugs blog rest in peace. I´ll take it down eventually. And yes, I stumbled over the decisions of the Ethics Panel regarding ...

Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen