- Yes. Let the o-zeugs blog rest in peace. I´ll take it down eventually.
- And yes, I stumbled over the decisions of the Ethics Panel regarding WC 2019 China again and thought I will end the blog with a meme dedicated to Ivar for making a difference between Chinese Athletes and "our guys" (e.g. Ricardo Scalet and Eveli Kaasiku) regarding what is possible while running on home-ground.
Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2025
o-zeugs over and out (late wc china finding)
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
o-zeugs over and out (late wc china finding)
Yes. Let the o-zeugs blog rest in peace. I´ll take it down eventually. And yes, I stumbled over the decisions of the Ethics Panel regarding ...
-
Yes. Let the o-zeugs blog rest in peace. I´ll take it down eventually. And yes, I stumbled over the decisions of the Ethics Panel regarding ... -
I wonder: How did the Chinese men and women as a team? The men The Chinese men started fast. Top 4 at the 3rd control after about...
3 Kommentare:
You'll have to wait until the end of time before you'll see an apologize from me for this.
I'll double down on the ethics panel and say that the sentence "Assuming the referral is aimed at Chinese ath-letes these analyses show that those who produced the best results are shown and known to be capable of such running speeds." in the Ethics Panel report is one of the most hilarious things I've ever read in relation to the sport of Orienteering. To write that in the sentence after calling out posters on social media for posting "subjective or uncollaborated claims" is great banter.
And the fact you think one should NOT make a difference between runners like Evely and Riccardo and guys like Li Zhuoye when it comes to questioning the ability to produce top results gives me peace of mind that I should not listen to you about this topic. If I was in Evely's or Riccardo's shoes I think I would feel very insulted if my results were compared to that of Li Zhuoye..
---
On another note:
I think your blog have a lot of interesting posts and there is a lot of Orienteering history in here. Especially some of the old pack analyses from big events are great and it would be a shame if you take down/delete the entire blog completely.
Lg,
Ivar
The main difference here is that there are real proofs that Chinese Athletes had already pre run the previous version of the WC course. Organizers presented their worries on that to IOF, but... Someone closed an eye and acted like all is fine.
Chinese Athletes lost lot of time only on those controls where the courses have been modified few days prior the race, after the whole CISM circus. These final changes were kept "secret" and only a very few trusted organizers were aware of.
- WC2019 Staff
Relativation like yours is one main trick in denying truth. Do not!
Kommentar veröffentlichen